sample report
This is what lands in your inbox.
Two of your own sentences, quoted verbatim, each under its own live URL, with the correction already written. No score, no grade, no dashboard to log into.
About this page
The company below is fictional, so that no real business is quoted here without being asked. The format, the wording and the 90 confidence floor are exactly what a real report uses. In a real report every excerpt links to a live page you can click, and both excerpts have been found verbatim on those pages twice.
Every finding carries one of three labels. A confirmed contradiction, like the two below, is the only kind we ever call verified. A pricing ambiguity is money wording that can honestly be read two ways. Needs human review means a person should read both pages before you change anything.
two findings
01 price mismatch
Confirmed contradiction
severity high|confidence 96/100
"Starter starts at $29 per user, per month."
https://example-saas.test/pricing · scanned sample
"Every plan, including Starter, is $19 per user per month when billed monthly."
https://example-saas.test/blog/our-new-pricing · scanned sample
Why these disagree
Both sentences state a monthly per-user price for the same named plan, and neither is marked as an annual discount, a promotion or a legacy price. A buyer comparing the two pages cannot tell which number they will be charged.
Proposed correction
"Starter is $29 per user, per month. The $19 figure in the pricing announcement was the launch price and ended on 1 March."
Uncertainty note
If the blog post is intended as an archive of an old announcement, add a dated note at the top rather than changing the number.
Verified twice against live pages · sample
02 capability overstatement
Confirmed contradiction
severity medium|confidence 93/100
"Two-way sync with Salesforce, HubSpot and Pipedrive."
https://example-saas.test/integrations · scanned sample
"The Pipedrive integration is read-only. Writing back to Pipedrive is on our roadmap."
https://example-saas.test/docs/pipedrive · scanned sample
Why these disagree
The integrations page lists Pipedrive inside a two-way sync claim while the documentation states the same integration is read-only. The documentation is the narrower and later statement, so the marketing page is the one that overstates.
Proposed correction
"Two-way sync with Salesforce and HubSpot. One-way sync with Pipedrive; write-back is on the roadmap."
Verified twice against live pages · sample
what else is in it
The rest of the audit.
Outdated information
Dated statements that have quietly stopped being true: a launch date that has passed, a beta that shipped, a plan that no longer exists.
Ambiguous information
Sentences that are not wrong but can be read two ways by a buyer with a budget, with the reading we think they will take.
20 simulated buyer questions
The questions your own pages provoke, in the order a buyer would ask them, each with the page that answers it or the note that nothing does.
Corrected text
Copy-and-paste replacement wording for every finding, in your own voice, so the fix takes minutes.
Executive summary
One page. If the scan verified fewer than three findings, the summary says so in the first line and you are refunded in full.
A free check reads up to 10 public pages and shows one finding. Truth Audit reads up to 24.
your turn
Run it on your own domain.
The free check takes a few minutes and needs a domain and a work email. No account, no card.